On August 11, 2020 Crowdmark founder James Colliander moderated a discussion featuring an elite panel of educators from across Canada and the USA. Our panelists included:
- Laura Pavelka from McGill University’s Department of Chemistry
- Cindy Fu from York University’s Department of Statistics
- Jennifer Murdock from the University of Toronto’s Department of Economics
Andrew Rivers, from Northwestern University’s Department of Physics, was also slated to sit on the panel but was unable to attend.
Panelists shared how they managed online assessment related to distance education as required by COVID-19, and how Crowdmark helped in the transition. Excellent insights were shared on topics including security and cheating, grading participation, time management and keeping your sanity while teaching remotely. Overall the panelists offered valuable perspective for educators heading into the Fall semester and still reeling from the COVID-19 crisis.
For a recording of the panel discussion, or more information for new Crowdmark users, reach out to firstname.lastname@example.org.
For questions related to your Crowdmark account, or issues arising while working in Crowdmark, reach out to email@example.com.
You can also check out a summary of questions and answers that were raised by attendees during the session below.
Thanks from the Crowdmark Team!
How has the shift to online teaching affected instances of cheating, and student grades?
With the COVID-19 crisis, the move to fully online instruction happened so fast that there was not enough time to reflect on how to make it most effective. Students and educators were forced into a new normal that made it easier and more rewarding for some students to find ways around traditional assessment methods, even when expectations to the contrary were made clear. At the same time, however, educators and administrators became more vigilant about students circumventing the assessment format, so a large number of these students were and continue to be exposed with the help of the Crowdmark team.
While the lasting effects of these issues with academic integrity remain unclear, moving forward we have the opportunity to build up new ways of assessing student learning that make it harder and less rewarding for students to seek answers elsewhere.
What is Crowdmark’s advice to educators who are concerned about academic integrity while assessing students online?
The continuing necessity of online education has provided educators with an incredible opportunity to reflect on why and how we assess student learning. While traditional assessment formats may invite unwanted collaboration or students searching outside sources for answers, assessments that focus on students’ individual learning and voice may discourage these behaviors. Increasing the frequency of assessments as well as varying formats and weighting is another strategy that is being employed to make cheating less rewarding for the student.
With that being said, there are still a number of ways that an educator, in collaboration with Crowdmark, can work to prevent issues with academic integrity in traditional assessments:
- Best Practices for Remote Exams
- Multiple Assessment Versions
- Using Filters to track trends in student responses
Crowdmark also tracks IP addresses for student submissions. This means if copies of assessments or students’ work are found to be distributed on outside sources, we are able to crossmatch IP addresses with student profiles at an instructor’s request.
Can proctoring be considered when assessing students remotely in Crowdmark?
Crowdmark is compatible with some versions of proctoring software, however even using those there are residual security concerns with the way students upload work to Crowdmark. We’ve been working on how Crowdmark can help with this, and we’ll have more information soon.
What is Crowdmark’s advice on grading participation?
At Crowdmark we believe that assessment should be used for learning. Assessment helps students identify gaps in their learning and helps instructors recognize gaps in their instruction. Ultimately, assessment is a source of ongoing dialogue between teachers and students that can drive learning.
It is also possible to track participation with Crowdmark. In an in-class scenario, you’d potentially track attendance, hand raising, etc. Online, great options include class-wide discussions (using LMS or collaboration software such as Google polls), group submissions, or setting a number of smaller assignments as optional.
Does Crowdmark have an easy way to allow for different starting times for an assessment?
Currently there are a couple options for this. We have a brand new Timed Assessment feature that allows you to set an asynchronous exam where a student has (for example) 2 hours within a day or a week to take an exam. To set a synchronous exam with different start times, you would use sections and multiple versions of an assessment. Lastly, you are now able to adjust students’ individual due dates, assessment time windows and late penalties in the student’s Activity Log.